<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Series Review: Sherlock Series 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greatdetectives.net/detectives/tv-series-review-sherlock-series-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greatdetectives.net/detectives/tv-series-review-sherlock-series-2/</link>
	<description>The great ones are back in action.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:22:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Waldee</title>
		<link>http://www.greatdetectives.net/detectives/tv-series-review-sherlock-series-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11582</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Waldee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatdetectives.net/detectives/?p=5980#comment-11582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adam, you NAILED these shows in your incisive comments!  I am glad to see that I&#039;m not the only one who is at turns perturbed, appalled, or merely stupefied by these cheesy &quot;post-modern recreations&quot;.  In the early sixties, my high school English teacher -- who wrote embarrassing psychological pseudo self portrait novels that were a cross between Philip Roth and Salinger -- told me to quit reading Doyle, whose Sherlock Holmes stories were &#039;racist, pretentious, contrived claptrap&#039;.  Whereas the REAL Sherlock Holmes canon has stood the test of time; my teacher remains (maybe there IS a just God!) unpublished...

The UK of today must be a miserable place, where the &quot;educated&quot; public are ashamed of their past.  We former rebellious colonists, thankfully, don&#039;t have to feel that way.

Srw]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, you NAILED these shows in your incisive comments!  I am glad to see that I&#8217;m not the only one who is at turns perturbed, appalled, or merely stupefied by these cheesy &#8220;post-modern recreations&#8221;.  In the early sixties, my high school English teacher &#8212; who wrote embarrassing psychological pseudo self portrait novels that were a cross between Philip Roth and Salinger &#8212; told me to quit reading Doyle, whose Sherlock Holmes stories were &#8216;racist, pretentious, contrived claptrap&#8217;.  Whereas the REAL Sherlock Holmes canon has stood the test of time; my teacher remains (maybe there IS a just God!) unpublished&#8230;</p>
<p>The UK of today must be a miserable place, where the &#8220;educated&#8221; public are ashamed of their past.  We former rebellious colonists, thankfully, don&#8217;t have to feel that way.</p>
<p>Srw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.greatdetectives.net/detectives/tv-series-review-sherlock-series-2/feed/ ) in 0.23876 seconds, on May 21st, 2013 at 11:23 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 21st, 2013 at 11:23 pm UTC -->