<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 21st Century Sherlock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greatdetectives.net/detectives/21st-century-sherlock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greatdetectives.net/detectives/21st-century-sherlock/</link>
	<description>The great ones are back in action.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:39:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.greatdetectives.net/detectives/21st-century-sherlock/comment-page-1/#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 21:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatdetectives.net/detectives/?p=2751#comment-1303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I watched the first run of &quot;Sherlock&quot; on Masterpiece Mystery.  IMHO, it&#039;s one of the better British imports of recent years.  The spirit of the Doyle stories is captured perfectly - far better than the Rathbone/Bruce films which cemented the unfortunate caricature of Dr. Watson as a bumbling baffoon rather than able assistant.  The allusions to the Holmes canon (the meaning of &quot;Rache&quot; in &quot;A Study in Pink;&quot; Holmes&#039; use of nicotine patches and his description of a case as a &quot;three patch problem&quot;) were well placed.  Most importantly, in this era where so many TV sleuths are Holmes-inspired (&quot;Monk,&quot; &quot;The Mentalist&quot;), &quot;Sherlock&quot; truly gives us Holmes instead of an imitator.  I&#039;m more a fan of the Doyle stories and the Jeremy Brett Granada series than the Rathbone films, so that could also account for my enjoyment of the Cumberbatch/Freeeman series.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the first run of &#8220;Sherlock&#8221; on Masterpiece Mystery.  IMHO, it&#8217;s one of the better British imports of recent years.  The spirit of the Doyle stories is captured perfectly &#8211; far better than the Rathbone/Bruce films which cemented the unfortunate caricature of Dr. Watson as a bumbling baffoon rather than able assistant.  The allusions to the Holmes canon (the meaning of &#8220;Rache&#8221; in &#8220;A Study in Pink;&#8221; Holmes&#8217; use of nicotine patches and his description of a case as a &#8220;three patch problem&#8221;) were well placed.  Most importantly, in this era where so many TV sleuths are Holmes-inspired (&#8220;Monk,&#8221; &#8220;The Mentalist&#8221;), &#8220;Sherlock&#8221; truly gives us Holmes instead of an imitator.  I&#8217;m more a fan of the Doyle stories and the Jeremy Brett Granada series than the Rathbone films, so that could also account for my enjoyment of the Cumberbatch/Freeeman series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.greatdetectives.net/detectives/21st-century-sherlock/feed/ ) in 0.24453 seconds, on May 22nd, 2013 at 1:45 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 22nd, 2013 at 1:45 pm UTC -->